View RSS Feed

Top Secret Files of a Mental Fugitive, Exposed

Transmission #9: Why /V/ Seems To Hate AVGN

Rate this Entry
Okay. Imagine this. It was the 1990s and you're just another stupid kid in living in the Philippines. Your father is an OFW in the Middle East, working just to give you a decent life and decent luxuries. And because it was the Fifth Generation Era of Gaming that time, all sorts of gaming machines and consoles were coming out. You know the cool new graphics of Nintendo 64, but only know Sega Saturn by name and never seen one before. But of course, you know the coolest and most rad machine that every rich kid had during that time, the Sony PlayStation. Syphon Filter, Strikers 1945, Army Men, Chocobo Racing, Bloody Roar 2, Destrega and many more. All of these games can be played on the newly released console.

You, as a kid, want to try that out and play with the newest games of the decade. Well, your father, however, can't afford the machine and doesn't consider it a bare necessity. He did, however, gave you another console...coming from the older Fourth Generation. It was the "Family Computer", as everyone called it. But you hated it and wanted to play the newer games instead. Nevertheless, you just put up with it, plugged the damn machine on the TV and presto, you're playing with it, tolerating the stupid-looking graphics and the crummy controls, while playing or even just watching PlayStation games on every little chance you get.

That was my experience before I went to high school, and before I discovered the Internet. Back then, I hated the Family Computer because, aside from the earlier given reasons, the name implies as if this console was designed as a watered-down version of the newer consoles and be sold for a quick buck. It sounded cheap, in other words. Then years later, I discovered, in Wikipedia, that it was indeed officially called Family Computer in Japan, Famicom for short, but in America, it was called Nintendo Emulator System, NES for short, and it sold millions back in it's generation.

Little did I know that the console I called "cheap" back then was one of the most popular and influential consoles in history. I grew a bit smarter in the day I discovered that, I said to myself. And I was proud to experience the old way of gaming.

Well, I'm pretty sure that almost anyone who played NES when they were children can relate to the nostalgia. And of course, when I say nostalgia, you might find bickering about today's games. And when I say bickering about games, two things come into my mind: /v/ and AVGN. Both of them complain about games and both have some kind of rage about it. However, /v/, if my memory serves me correctly, does not exactly like the Nerd. Okay, I'll give you this: /v/ hates everything. That's because /v/ is not one person. It is a legion of people gaming before gaming became cool, people who were bullied one point because of their behavior and people who can't accept the fact that games today have become so watered down and made casual, without any real challenge to those who want it.

Still, here are my perceived reasons or theories about it:

First, AVGN seems to be a satire of /v/. The /v/idya gaem board is renowned for two things, shitstorm and hardcore dislike for modern casual games. If you lurked the board for at least a year, you will find days where everything is just trolls trolling trolls trolling trolls. Even if they weren't having a bad day, you will see fragments of rage all over the place. It's like no one is bound to agree with no one here, but that's a given with 4chan already. (Or with people, even.) The problem is, they are outright disrespecting each others' point of view because they think it is stupid, the other side is forcing it, out of spite or just because they can, without getting shit in real life. They also tend to complain about games being "casualized" on this current generation, whether you agree with that or not. That's where the similarities and exaggerations of James Rolfe's character come in. The Nerd "literally lives in the past", as Rolfe described him in a Q&A, an exaggeration to the nostalgiafags or even some people on /v/. He also tends to lash out on the games with a very vulgar and literally dirty vocabulary, an exaggerated metaphor to /v/'s mudslinging and often-politically incorrect language, which they use on the arguments that usually happen on the board. What's worst, the usual target of AVGN's filth-ridden and vitriolic criticism were older games and of course, /v/ likes to rage a lot, especially when their common interests are bashed.

Second, James Rolfe himself wasn't much of a skillful gamer himself, as he also admitted on the Q&A, saying that he only finished a few of the games in his massive collection. As a result, this level of skill translates to his character's actual skill, which means that he might be shitting on the older games that he didn't even finish. And for /v/, that is bound to rustle their jimmies because, for them, it is tantamount to heavily criticizing a story without even reading or finishing a book, which they consider masterpieces, especially if they finished and loved the game.

And third, the Angry Video Game Nerd is just a character. So what's so bad about that? That only means that the whole thing is scripted, which includes even the rants and swearing. And due to Rolfe's educational background in film making and aspirations, he also tends to put episodic storylines in each of his videos, which puts off some people on YouTube, preferring game reviews that are simply reviews. This, combined with the first two reasons, surely pisses off most people on /v/.

So to sum up this entry, /v/ thinks James Rolfe is a phony, a casual and an attention whore, if we use their vocabulary. But then again, this is just my opinion according to my observation, so take it as you want and will. As for me, I like his reviews, but I think his theatricality is a bit excessive. And he does make me thankful that I played NES first.

But damn, I saw a video of Karateka's and B-Wings' gameplay and it already angers me. I guess I still do appreciate my era, the Fifth and so forth Generation.

Comments

  1. Dark Pulse's Avatar
    Actually, the NES was the Third Generation.

    Generations tend to run a bit concurrently - we're actually in a rare phase where we have three generations still technically active. To wit:


    • Generation 1 (1972-1977): Magnavox Odyssey, Coleco Telstar, Nintendo Color Video Game (Yes, they were here!). Ended in the Videogame Crash of 1977, when Pong Clones essentially all died out.
    • Generation 2 (1976-1984): Atari 2600/5200, Intellivision, Magnavox Odyssey2. Also ended in a crash, this one more famous - the Videogame Crash of 1983 which nearly killed the industry.
    • Generation 3 (1983-1992): NES, Sega Master System, Atari 7800. The first "real generation" of gamers to whom this was potentially everyday life.
    • Generation 4 (1987-1996): SNES, Sega Genesis/Megadrive, TurboGrafx-16, Neo-Geo. The start of really complex games. Some later games began 3D Capabilities (Starfox on SNES, or Virtua Racing on the Genesis/Megadrive for example).
    • Generation 5 (1993-2006): Playstation, Saturn, N64. The first disc-based games. 3D gaming is now commonplace. The N64 has no load times unlike its competitiors, but it has its own problems (textures, game size, etc).
    • Generation 6 (1998-Present): PS2, Gamecube, XBox, Dreamcast. The first really good-looking 3D games. All optical media by this point. A handful of games are still being made for PS2 - which is, indeed, still being produced!
    • Generation 7 (2005-Present): PS3, Wii, XBox 360. The "main" current generation, now in its end years.
    • Generation 8 (2012): Wii U. The next generation. Only one console announced so far, not counting handhelds.


    Speaking of handhelds, those are usually grouped by their respective generation, so a Game Boy and Game Gear are both Third-Generation (The Game Gear is actually almost as powerful as the Sega Master System!), while the Game Boy Advance would be considered Fifth-Generation.

    That said, games have definitely changed. Anyone who grew up on an NES really knows the meaning of difficult videogames - to the point there's a term for it, "Nintendo Hard." The stuff that'd make you throw your controllers. Nowadays, even hard games are fairly forgiving at times (notable exception: The Ninja Gaiden reboots which are damn near as unfair as in the NES days). Doesn't mean they're worse, but sometimes, a game almost seems to easy to us old salts.

    That said, it's good that younger people can still look back at these and see the interesting things they had to offer. A lot of today's popular franchises got their starts on the NES after all, and what they lacked in graphics, or complexity, they had in ingenuity. My brother (who is 14), for all his faults, can at least still play and enjoy some of these games. They're not as flashy or complex as something today, but well, there's still a good simplicity in them, and I still find many of the older games fun to this day.

    Although I have a feeling my future kids will call me weird if they ever catch Dad playing something so primitive.

    Anyway, that's my two cents.
  2. Ivan The Mouse's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Pulse
    Actually, the NES was the Third Generation.
    Oh, this is going to suck for me. I was still playing NES when the PlayStation came out!

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Pulse
    Generations tend to run a bit concurrently - we're actually in a rare phase where we have three generations still technically active. To wit:

    • Generation 1 (1972-1977): Magnavox Odyssey, Coleco Telstar, Nintendo Color Video Game (Yes, they were here!). Ended in the Videogame Crash of 1977, when Pong Clones essentially all died out.
    • Generation 2 (1976-1984): Atari 2600/5200, Intellivision, Magnavox Odyssey2. Also ended in a crash, this one more famous - the Videogame Crash of 1983 which nearly killed the industry.
    • Generation 3 (1983-1992): NES, Sega Master System, Atari 7800. The first "real generation" of gamers to whom this was potentially everyday life.
    • Generation 4 (1987-1996): SNES, Sega Genesis/Megadrive, TurboGrafx-16, Neo-Geo. The start of really complex games. Some later games began 3D Capabilities (Starfox on SNES, or Virtua Racing on the Genesis/Megadrive for example).
    • Generation 5 (1993-2006): Playstation, Saturn, N64. The first disc-based games. 3D gaming is now commonplace. The N64 has no load times unlike its competitiors, but it has its own problems (textures, game size, etc).
    • Generation 6 (1998-Present): PS2, Gamecube, XBox, Dreamcast. The first really good-looking 3D games. All optical media by this point. A handful of games are still being made for PS2 - which is, indeed, still being produced!
    • Generation 7 (2005-Present): PS3, Wii, XBox 360. The "main" current generation, now in its end years.
    • Generation 8 (2012): Wii U. The next generation. Only one console announced so far, not counting handhelds.

    Speaking of handhelds, those are usually grouped by their respective generation, so a Game Boy and Game Gear are both Third-Generation (The Game Gear is actually almost as powerful as the Sega Master System!), while the Game Boy Advance would be considered Fifth-Generation.
    This is interesting and informative. Thank you!

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Pulse
    That said, games have definitely changed. Anyone who grew up on an NES really knows the meaning of difficult videogames - to the point there's a term for it, "Nintendo Hard." The stuff that'd make you throw your controllers. Nowadays, even hard games are fairly forgiving at times (notable exception: The Ninja Gaiden reboots which are damn near as unfair as in the NES days). Doesn't mean they're worse, but sometimes, a game almost seems to easy to us old salts.
    Yeah, I remember when I was a kid and I can't get past Contra's first stage, and we didn't know the Konami code back then. Or maybe B-Wings when you accidentally eject your wings due to not knowing the buttons. And let's not talk about Clu Clu Land. Or Macross.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Pulse
    That said, it's good that younger people can still look back at these and see the interesting things they had to offer. A lot of today's popular franchises got their starts on the NES after all, and what they lacked in graphics, or complexity, they had in ingenuity. My brother (who is 14), for all his faults, can at least still play and enjoy some of these games. They're not as flashy or complex as something today, but well, there's still a good simplicity in them, and I still find many of the older games fun to this day.
    Yes. Too bad I was a kid back then, so I thought they were too hard and kept the TV at mute because I thought the NES sounds were scary.

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Pulse
    Although I have a feeling my future kids will call me weird if they ever catch Dad playing something so primitive.

    Anyway, that's my two cents.
    My future kids, if I ever have them, will think WW2 Call of Duty is primitive.
  3. RoadBuster's Avatar
    To this day, I still play retro as much as modern, maybe even moreso on the retro. Nothing against modern games, really, I just really like the games from the late 80s through most the 90s. That Neo-Geo AES I got is already getting the hours on it.

    As for the AVGN... it's a show. Like you said, it's a character. Think of it like Pro Wrestling. It's for entertainment moreso than some journalistic review of the games. Lol, of course, /V/ will rage at whatever they can since raging seems to be their favorite passtime.
  4. Ivan The Mouse's Avatar
    Quote Originally Posted by RoadBuster
    To this day, I still play retro as much as modern, maybe even moreso on the retro. Nothing against modern games, really, I just really like the games from the late 80s through most the 90s. That Neo-Geo AES I got is already getting the hours on it.
    Ah, I wish I still have my Family Computer.

    Quote Originally Posted by RoadBuster
    As for the AVGN... it's a show. Like you said, it's a character. Think of it like Pro Wrestling. It's for entertainment moreso than some journalistic review of the games. Lol, of course, /V/ will rage at whatever they can since raging seems to be their favorite passtime.
    Yes. I am not a big fan of his theatrics, but sometimes the theatrics are actually good. In fact, I think the show would stale off if it wasn't for the episodic antics. But I still liked the way he reviews the games when not swearing.

    But it's just TV, I just really need to relax.